Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix e2e tests broken in #17865 #19009

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 22, 2015
Merged

Conversation

fgrzadkowski
Copy link
Contributor

It was broken in #17865

@davidopp @HaiyangDING - FYI

@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ func verifyResult(c *client.Client, podName string, ns string) {
"involvedObject.kind": "Pod",
"involvedObject.name": podName,
"involvedObject.namespace": ns,
"source": "scheduler",
"source": api.DefaultSchedulerName,
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we shouldn't change this one, since this is about 1.0 branch, which didn't change.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good catch!

@fgrzadkowski
Copy link
Contributor Author

@wojtek-t Done. PTAL

@k8s-github-robot k8s-github-robot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Dec 22, 2015
@k8s-github-robot
Copy link

Labelling this PR as size/XS

@wojtek-t wojtek-t added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 22, 2015
@wojtek-t
Copy link
Member

LGTM

fgrzadkowski added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 22, 2015
@fgrzadkowski fgrzadkowski merged commit e164098 into kubernetes:master Dec 22, 2015
@k8s-bot
Copy link

k8s-bot commented Dec 22, 2015

GCE e2e build/test failed for commit 4ee0e7e.

@k8s-bot
Copy link

k8s-bot commented Dec 22, 2015

GCE e2e test build/test passed for commit 17c5fb10375957dbe60334b6b992559484f9d4a1.

openshift-publish-robot pushed a commit to openshift/kubernetes that referenced this pull request May 22, 2018
Differentiate liveness and readiness probes for router pods

Origin-commit: 13d42ec71f692b7b35b5efdd32c86b3df73e410e
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants